ANALYSIS OF THE POWER OF ONLINE TICKET LAWS IN PROVIDING CONVENIENCE FOR TRAFFIC OFFENDERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52431/minhaj.v4i2.1688Keywords:
Analysis, Online Ticketing, Traffic OffendersAbstract
One of the most frequent and easily identifiable legal violations is traffic violations. Traffic violations are a common phenomenon in large cities in developing countries like Indonesia. The problem addressed in this journal article is: what is the accountability of traffic violators? What is the legal power of the online ticketing system in facilitating traffic violators, and what are the efforts to combat traffic violations? The research is based on normative juridical methodology and empirical approaches, with data obtained from literature sources such as secondary and primary data through qualitative analysis to obtain accurate and objective research results. The research findings show that the accountability of traffic violators is adjusted according to the decision of the judge's council that the perpetrator has been proven legally and convincingly guilty of traffic violations, with a fine of IDR 49,000 (forty-nine thousand rupiahs), and the defendant must pay a case fee of IDR 1,000 (one thousand rupiahs). The legal power of online ticketing provides convenience for traffic violators who can pay fines through mobile or e-banking to BRI Bank accounts that have been appointed and serve as valid proof, which will later be transferred to the prosecutor's office without having to go directly to court or the prosecutor's office. Efforts to address traffic violations in the Tulang Bawang Police Resort area are taken through several steps, including pre-emptive measures such as socialization or counseling to the community about proper driving manners, preventive measures such as operations to identify drivers who do not have official documents, and repressive measures such as chasing and arresting perpetrators who flee after committing traffic violations, conducting investigations and prosecutions against perpetrators of traffic violations. The author suggests increasing public awareness and encouraging compliance with traffic laws through continued socialization of E-Ticketing by the Tulang Bawang Police Traffic Unit.
Downloads
References
A.S Alam. Pengantar Kriminologi. Makasar: Pustaka Refleksi Book, 2010.
Ahmad Munawar. Dasar-Dasar Teknik Transportasi. Yogyakarta: Beta Offset, 2011.
Alfarisi, Mochammad Hilmi. “Urgensi Peran Peradilan Al-Mazalim Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Administrasi.” Minhaj: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah 1, no. 2 (2020): 103–18.
Andre Birawa, Liliana Tedjosaputro. “Criminal Law Enforcemnt Policy On Mineral And Coal Mining Businesses.” Magistra Law Review (MaLRev) 1, no. 2 (2020): 114–35.
Anshoruddin. Hukum Pembuktian Menurut Hukum Acara Islam Dan Hukum Positif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.
Bambang Purnomo. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1985.
Barda Nawawi Arief. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Semarang: Kencana, 2008.
Destiyanto, R. Restu. “Analisis Kinerja Lalu Lintas Di Jembatan Landak.” Jurnal Teknik Sipil Untan, 2019, 1–13.
Eddy O.S Hiariej. Teori Dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.
Faisol Rizal. “Peran Mediasi Sebagai Salah Satu Solusi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.” 2Minhaj: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah 3, no. 1 (2022): 17–30.
Fauzi, M. Yusuf, and Zainab Ompu Jainah. “Analisis Pertangung Jawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Percobaan Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan (Studi Putusan Nomor: 122 /Pid.B/2021/PN.Kbu).” Jurnal Suara Keadilan 23, no. 1 (2022): 95–118. https://doi.org/10.24176/sk.v23i1.8558.
Hidayat, Rahmat. “Konsep Pendidikan Karakter Dalam Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam (Studi Pemikiran Burhanuddin Al-Zarnuji).” Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan 3, no. 2 (2019): 1. https://doi.org/10.31958/jsk.v3i2.1692.
John M. Echols. Kamus Bahasa Inggris, An English-Indonesian Dictionary. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia, 2003.
Julyano, Mario, and Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum.” Crepido 1, no. 1 (2019): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22.
Junef, Muhar. “Perilaku Masyarakat Terhadap Operasi Bukti Pelanggaran ( Tilang ) Dalam Berlalu Lintas.” Jurnal Widya Yustisia 1, no. 1 (2014): 52–60.
Junianto, Johan Dwi. “Obstruction of Justice Dalam Pasal 21 Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Media Iuris 2, no. 3 (2020): 335. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v2i3.15208.
Kenedi, John. “Kebijakan Kriminal Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia: Upaya Mensejahterakan Masyarakat.” L-Imarah: Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam 2, no. 1 (2017): 17.
Lamintang dan Samosir. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1983.
M. Muzyafa’. “Pengaruh Demografis, Brand Image Dan Perceived Benefit Terhadap Keputusan Nasabah Menjadi Mitra PT. BPRS Lantabur Tebuireng Cab. Mojokerto.” Minhaj 1, no. 2 (2020).
Mahmul Siregar. Law Is a Tool of Social Engineering. Medan: Universitas Sumatra Utara, n.d.
Moeljanto. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2005.
Moh. Syamsul Muarif. “Studi Kritis Analisis Teks Dan Konteks Hukum Koin Digital Sebagai Alat Pembayaran.” Minhaj: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah 2, no. 2 (2021).
Nurul Azizah, Misbahuddin, Ibtisam, Herman. “Tinjauan Hukum Islam Terhadap Etos Kerja.” Minhaj: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah 2, no. 2 (2021): 131–48.
P.A.F Lamintang. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1997.
Rahmat Hidayat, MA Achlami HS, Hasan Mukmin, H. Rosidi, Rini Setiawati. “Analysis And Relevance Of Hamka’s Praise Thought In The Post-Modern Age.” Jurnal Syntax Transformation 4, no. 5 (2023): 74–87.
Rakhmadani, Syeni. “E-Ticketed (E-Tilang) Application Analysis in Delivering Good Governance in Indonesia.” Prosiding SNaPP: Sosial, Ekonomi Dan Humaniora 7, no. 3 (2017): 663–71.
Republik Indonesai. Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Republik Indonesia (n.d.).
Roeslan Saleh. Perbuatan Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana; Dua Pengertian Dasar Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Centra, 1983.
———. Pikiran-Pikiran Tentang Pertangungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2002.
Sari, Ni Putu Riyani Kartika, and Ni Luh Putu Geney Sri Kusuma Dewi. “Eksistensi Teori Pembuktian Positief Wettelijk Bewijstheorie Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata.” AKSES Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Ngurah Rai 12, no. 2 (2020): 132–40. http://www.ojs.unr.ac.id/index.php/akses/article/view/695.
Soerjono Soekanto. Inventarisasi Dan Analisis Terhadap Perundang-Undangan Lalu Lintas. Jakarta: CV Rajawali, 1984.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2007.
Sugianto, Umi Aisyah, Esen Pramudya Utama, Rahmat Hidayat. “Transformasi Islam Moderat Mohammad Natsir Dalam Bernegara” 4, no. 2 (2021): 1–30.
Syuhada’, Muhammad Misbahul Munir. “Pengembangan Dan Pengelolaan Zakat Produktif.” Minhaj: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah 1, no. 1 (2020): 69–85.
Topo Santoso dan Eva Achjani Zulfa. Kriminologi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.
Utama, Esen Pramudya, Nina Ayu, Puspita Sari, Yuli Habibah, sugianto, and Rahmat Hidayat. “Edukatif?: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Transformasi Pendidikan Berorientasi Kewirausahaan Pada Perguruan Tinggi Islam Swasta Provinsi Lampung” 4, no. 2 (2022): 2491–2500.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Maulida Fitri, Muhamad Zainuri, RAHMAT HIDAYAT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
- Seluruh materi yang terdapat dalam situs ini dilindungi oleh undang-undang. Dilarang mengutip sebagian atau seluruh isi situs web ini untuk keperluan komersil tanpa persetujuan dewan penyunting jurnal ini.
- Apabila anda menemukan satu atau beberapa artikel yang terdapat dalam Minhaj: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah yang melanggar atau berpotensi melanggar hak cipta yang anda miliki, silahkan laporkan kepada kami, melalui email pada CONTACT.
- Aspek legal formal terhadap akses setiap informasi dan artikel yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini mengacu pada ketentuan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
Semua Informasi yang terdapat di Minhaj: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah bersifat akademik. Minhaj: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap kerugian yang terjadi karana penyalah gunaan informasi dari situs ini.