Kritik Teologis Al-Ghazali Terhadap Metafisika Filsuf Muslim
Analisis Atas Tiga Pokok Pemikiran Dalam Tahāfut Al-Falāsifah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52431/tafaqquh.v13i1.3702Keywords:
Al-Ghazali, Tahāfut al-Falāsifah, Islamic philosophy, metaphysics, Ash’arism, theological critiqueAbstract
The reception of Greek philosophy in the Islamic world through the translation of classical texts sparked debates between rationality and revelation in Islamic intellectual tradition. This study aims to analyze Al-Ghazali’s critique of three main points in the thought of classical Muslim philosophers as outlined in Tahāfut al-Falāsifah: the eternity of the world, the limitation of God's knowledge to universals, and the notion of resurrection involving only the soul. This research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach and content analysis of primary texts and relevant secondary literature. The findings reveal that Al-Ghazali’s critique represents a synthesis between Ash’arite theology and philosophical rationalism, firmly rejecting metaphysical concepts that he deemed incompatible with Islamic faith principles. The study concludes that Al-Ghazali’s critique should not be viewed as a rejection of philosophy per se, but rather as an effort to safeguard the integrity of Islamic doctrine through a systematic theological-philosophical approach. His critique significantly contributes to Islamic philosophical discourse and fosters an epistemological dialogue between reason and revelation.
Downloads
References
Al-Ghazali, Imam. Ihya Ulum Ad-Din. 1st ed. Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm, 2005.
Arifin, Azis, and Jaipuri Harahap. “Kritik Al-Ghazali Terhadap Para Filsuf.” Aqlania: Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi Islam 12, no. 1 (2021): 75–94. https://doi.org/10.32678/aqlania.v12i1.4375.
Atabik, Ahmad. “Telah Pemikiran Al-Ghazali Tentang Filsafat.” Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Akidah Dan Studi Keagamaan 2, no. 1 (2014): 19–40. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/fikrah.v2i1.551.
Bahaf, Muhamad Afif. Filsafat Islam: Pengantar Awal Ke Alam Pikiran Filosof Muslim. 1st ed. Serang: MA-eye Press, 2008.
Fathurrahman. Filsafat Islam. Bandung: Manggu Makmur Tanjung Lestari, 2020.
Gholib, Ahmad. FILSAFAT ISLAM. 1st ed. jakarta: FAZA MEDIA, 2009.
Hasyim, Muhammad Syarif. “AL- ASY’ARIYAH (Studi Tentang Pemikiran Al-Baqillani, Al-Juwaini, Al-Ghazali).” Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika 2, no. 3 (2005): 209–24. https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.Vol2.Iss3.317.
Hayani, Suma, Andi Saputra, and Saidul Amin. “PANDANGAN AL-GHAZALI TENTANG QADIM DAN BAHARU ALAM SEMESTA.” Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 21, no. 2 (2019): 148–61. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/substantia.v21i2.5760.
Hourani, George F. “A Revised Chronology of Ghazālī’s Writings.” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 1984. http://www.jstor.org/stable/602173.
Imam al-ghazali. Tahafut Al-Falasifah. Edited by Sulaiman Dunya. 4th ed. Kairo: dar al-ma’arif bi misr, 1966.
Jamhari. “Al-Ghazali Dan Oposisinya Terhadap FIlsafat.” Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama 16, no. 1 (2015): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19109/jia.v16i1.502.
Kusuma, Al-Halim, and Laila Rahmadani. “Imam Al-Ghazali Dan Pemikirannya.” EKHSIS: Jurnal Ekonomi, Syariah Dan Studi Islam 1, no. 1 (2023): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.59548/je.v1i1.18.
M. Khidri Rahmad Dini, Mirnawati, and Dara Puspita Loka. “PEMIKIRAN MODERN KONTEMPORER ISLAM: MASA KEMUNDURAN ISLAM DAN PENJAJAHAN BARAT TERHADAP DUNIA ISLAM.” Jurnal Religion: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya 1, no. 2 (2023): 265–77. https://doi.org/10.55606/religion.v1i2.83.
Mahmud, Akilah. “JEJAK PEMIKIRAN AL-GHAZALI DAN IBNU RUSYD DALAM PERKEMBANGAN TEOLOGI ISLAM.” Sulesana: Jurnal Wawasan Keislaman 13, no. 2 (2019): 183–98. https://doi.org/10.24252/sulesana.v13i2.13406.
Mansur. “METODE KRITIK NALAR FILSAFAT AL-GHAZALI.” Jurnal Hermeneia 3, no. 2 (2004): 1–24. http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/8444%0A.
Mujahidin, Sultan. “THE SUPREMACY OF REVELATION OVER REASON : AL- GHAZALI ’ S CRITIQUE OF RATIONALIST PHILOSOPHY IN TAHAFUT AL-FALASIFAH.” Islamic Thought Review 2, no. 2 (2024): 151–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/itr.v2i2.8838 162.
Muliati. “AL-GHAZALI DAN KRITIKNYA TERHADAP FILOSOF.” Jurnal Aqidah-Ta 2, no. 2 (2016): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.24252/aqidahta.v2i2.3436.
Mulyadi. “ARGUMENTASI FILISOFIS AL-KINDI, IBN RUSYD, DAN AL- FARABI TENTANG KEKEKALAN ALAM.” AT-TAFKIR: Jurnal Pendidikan, Hukum Dan Sosial Keagamaan 12, no. 2 (2019): 131–40. https://doi.org/10.32505/at.v12i2.1341.
Parlaungan, Haidar Putra Daulay, and Zaini Dahlan. “Pemikiran Ibnu Sina Dalam Bidang Filsafat.” Jurnal Bilqolam Pendidikan Islam 2, no. 1 (2021): 79–93. https://doi.org/10.51672/jbpi.v2i1.51.
Putri, Febrianti Rosiana, and Abdulloh Arif Mukhlas. “Memahami Metode Pendidikan Akhlak Dalam Perspektif Islam: Perbandingan Pemikiran Imam Al-Ghazali Dan Abdullah Nashih ‘Ulwan.” Al-Jadwa: Jurnal Studi Islam 2, no. 2 (2023): 223–37. https://doi.org/10.38073/aljadwa.v2i2.987.
Rozi, Fathur. “Kritik Al-Ghazali Terhadap Pemikiran Para Filosof.” Edited by Achmad Imam Bashori. PUTIH: Jurnal Pengetahuan Tentang Ilmu Dan Hikmah 5, no. 1 (2020): 1–14.
Said, Idrus M., and Asbar Tantu. “PENGARUH KONSEPSI FILSAFAT IMAM AL-GHAZALI DAN UPAYA MENDAMAIKAN SYARIAH DAN TASAWUF.” Jurnal Fastabiqulkhairaat 3, no. 1 (2022): 28–44. https://jurnalfastabiqulkhairaat.faiunisapalu.ac.id/index.php/jfk/article/view/10.
Saiful Anwar. Filsafat Ilmu Al-Ghazali. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2007.
Sholeh, Moh. Jufriyadi. “COUNTER IBNU RUSYD TERHADAP KRITIK IMAM GHAZALI TENTANG FILSAFAT.” El-Waroqoh: Jurnal Ushuluddin Dan Filsafat 6, no. 1 (2022): 26–44. https://doi.org/10.28944/el-waroqoh.v6i1.642.
Siraj, Fuad Mahbub. “Relevansi Filsafat Islam Pada Era Modern.” Jurnal Universitas Paramadina 12, no. 1 (2015): 1379–97.
Soleh, Khudori. Filsafat Islam Dari Klasik Hinga Kontemporer. Edited by Aziz Safa. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: AR-RUZZ MEDIA, 2016.
Syam, M Basir. “PERBEDAAN PENDAPAT ULAMA TENTANG URGENSI FILSAFAT DALAM ISLAM.” Jurnal Aqidah-Ta 3, no. 2 (2017): 123–28. https://doi.org/10.24252/aqidahta.v3i2.4530.
Syukri, and Sabariah. SEJARAH PERTUMBUHAN DAN PERKEMBANGAN FILSAFAT ISLAM. Edited by Bincar Nasution. 1st ed. Padang Sidempuan: PT Inovasi Pratama Internasional, 2024.
Woodlock, Rachel. “Problems with The Avicennian Concept of God’s Knowledge.” The Islamic Perspective Journal 3, no. 3 (2010): 103–7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Afdalul Ummah, Muhammad Aska Irfani, Dendi Nugraha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
- Seluruh materi yang terdapat dalam situs ini dilindungi oleh undang-undang. Dilarang mengutip sebagian atau seluruh isi situs web ini untuk keperluan komersil tanpa persetujuan dewan penyunting jurnal ini.
- Apabila anda menemukan satu atau beberapa artikel yang terdapat dalam Tafaqquh: Jurnal penelitian dan kajian Keislaman yang melanggar atau berpotensi melanggar hak cipta yang anda miliki, silahkan laporkan kepada kami, melalui email pada CONTACT.
- Aspek legal formal terhadap akses setiap informasi dan artikel yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini mengacu pada ketentuan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
- Semua Informasi yang terdapat di Tafaqquh: Jurnal penelitian dan kajian Keislaman bersifat akademik. Tafaqquh: Jurnal penelitian dan kajian Keislaman tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap kerugian yang terjadi karana penyalah gunaan informasi dari situs ini.
