Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Hubungannya dengan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut KUHP; Perspektif Teori Maqâṣid Sharî’ah

  • Moh. Faizur Rohman Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, Surabaya
Keywords: HAM, Defamation, KUHP, Freedom Opinion, Maqâṣid Sharî’ah

Abstract

Human rights are often echoed by various parties are sometimes opposed to each other. Many journalists who exercised the right to freedom of expression expressed the opinion that the right has been protected by the 1945 Constitution article 28 E (3), precisely resulting in a criminal offense of defamation for those who do not like it. Defamation articles in the Criminal Code are often regarded as a powerful weapon against a criticism as a form of antipathy against criticism. Therefore, there should be efforts to classify the forms of the use of rights and forms of criminal acts. and will be seen from the standpoint of maqâṣid sharî’ah. Through approach statue approach, and case approach, obtained that the law has protected the rights of everyone in expressing opinions. Every person shall have the right and freedom to express opinions but such rights shall not infringe the rights of others. In maqâṣid is guaranteed and protected self-esteem, the soul for every human being is contained in the principle of ḥifḍu al-nafs wa al-‘ird. Therefore, in every opinion, communicate and socialize should pay attention to the rights of others is the dignity of one's dignity to create a balanced and harmonious life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Eddy OS Hiariej, (Guru Besar Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum UGM), Memahami Pencemaran Nama Baik, dalam http://beniharmoniharefa.blogspot.com/2011/03/ memahami-pencemaran-nama-baik.html, Dimuat pada Harian KOMPAS, 5 Juni 2009
http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt517f3d9f2544a/perbuatan-perbuatan-yang-termasuk-pencemaran-nama-baik
http://www.kompasiana.com/hoshizora/pelanggaran-ham-pencemaran-nama-baik-seseo rang -kelompok-di-sosmed.
Josua Sitompul, Cyberspace, Cybercrimes, Cyberlaw: Tinjauan Aspek Hukum Pidana, (Jakarta: Tatanusa, 2012), dalam id.safenetvoice.org/2014/03/lagi-salah-kaprah-pasal-27-ayat-3-uu-ite/
Lesmana, Tjipta. Pencemaran Nama Baik dan Kebebasan Pers Antara Indonesia dan Amerika, Jakarta: Rika Press, 2005.
Mahfud, Moh. MD. Demokrasi Dan Konstitusi Di Indonesia, Studi Tentang Interaksi Politik Dan Kehidupan Ketatanegaraan. Yogjakarta: Liberty, 2000.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Ikhtisar Putusan Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang dan Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara Mahkamah Konstitusi 2008-2009, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Cetakan Pertama, Agustus 2010, ISBN: 978-602-8308-27-4.
Sudarto. Hukum Dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 2007.
Tahmid, Muh. Maslahat Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam. Jurnal Diskursus Islam, STAIN Palopo Sulut, Volume 1 Nomor 2, Agustus 2013.
Undang–Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
UU No. 26 Tahun 2000 tentang Pengadilan HAM.
UU RI Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
UUD NRI Tahun 1945
Wadjo, NurHadiba Z. “Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam Pemberitaan Pers” Jurnal Sasi, Vol. 17 No.2 Bulan April – Juni 2011.
Wahid, Ramin Abd. “Maqashid al-Syari'ah dan Penerapan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Masyarakat Islam” Jurnal Salam Poltekom Malang, Vol 15 No 1, Juni 2012.
Published
2017-11-13
How to Cite
Rohman, M. (2017, November 13). Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Hubungannya dengan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut KUHP; Perspektif Teori Maqâṣid Sharî’ah. Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman, 5(2), 49-72. Retrieved from http://jurnal.iaibafa.ac.id/index.php/tafaqquh/article/view/81
Section
Article